Higher Education and Research Institutes – Enterprise Architecture Development Framework (Based on TOGAF)
PHASE A: ARCHITECTURE VISION
1: Establish the Architecture Project
Step | Details |
---|---|
I | Supplier: Architecture Sponsor, Project Management Office (PMO) Input: Request for Architecture Work, Organizational Goals, Preliminary Vision Process: – Initiate the architecture project. – Define project structure, governance, and initial objectives. Activities: – Assign roles and responsibilities. – Define preliminary project timelines and deliverables. Control: Project charter, governance structure, budget approval Feedback: Stakeholder feedback on project goals and feasibility Resources: Project managers, architects, governance team Stakeholders: Architecture sponsor, senior management, architecture board, business leads Metrics: Project initiation timeline, stakeholder alignment Risks: Misalignment on scope, inadequate resource allocation Constraints: Budget limitations, resource availability Scope: Limited to establishing project scope and governance Value Addition: Clear understanding of project objectives and governance ensures alignment. Assumptions: Project goals are aligned with organizational strategy, stakeholders are supportive. |
2: Identify Stakeholders, Concerns, and Business Requirements
Step | Details |
---|---|
II |
Supplier: Business leadership, key stakeholders Input: Organizational goals, stakeholder concerns, high-level business requirements Process: – Identify and engage key stakeholders. – Document their concerns, expectations, and requirements. Activities: – Conduct stakeholder interviews. – Define business drivers and goals. Control: Stakeholder management plan, business case Feedback: Regular feedback loops with stakeholders to clarify expectations Resources: Business analysts, architects, stakeholder management tools Stakeholders: Business executives, customers, regulatory authorities Metrics: Stakeholder engagement levels, clarity of requirements Risks: Misunderstanding stakeholder concerns, scope creep Constraints: Stakeholder availability, conflicting interests Scope: Focused on gathering stakeholder concerns and requirements Value Addition: Ensures architecture aligns with business needs and stakeholder expectations. Assumptions: Stakeholders are knowledgeable about business needs and available for input. |
3. Confirm and Elaborate Business Goals, Business Drivers, and Constraints
Step | Details |
---|---|
III |
Supplier: Senior leadership, business units Input: Strategic objectives, business drivers, high-level constraints Process: – Validate business goals and drivers. – Identify constraints that could impact architecture. Activities: – Refine goals and drivers. – Document operational, financial, and regulatory constraints. Control: Business strategy documentation, constraint analysis Feedback: Stakeholder review of goals and constraints Resources: Business leaders, strategy analysts Stakeholders: Business sponsors, regulators, key internal stakeholders Metrics: Alignment of goals with organizational strategy, constraint identification Risks: Misalignment between goals and strategy, underestimated constraints Constraints: Regulatory, financial, operational limitations Scope: Business goals and constraints relevant to architecture Value Addition: Provides clarity on business direction and limitations for architecture. Assumptions: Business goals are stable and aligned with long-term strategy. |
4. Evaluate Capabilities
Step | Details |
---|---|
IV | Supplier: Business units, capability owners Input: Existing enterprise capabilities, capability maturity models Process: – Assess current organizational capabilities. – Identify gaps in capability to meet business objectives. Activities: – Perform capability assessments. – Document capability gaps. Control: Capability maturity models, assessment frameworks Feedback: Capability assessment results reviewed by stakeholders Resources: Capability analysts, subject matter experts (SMEs) Stakeholders: Capability owners, business units, architects Metrics: Capability gaps identified, capability maturity scores Risks: Inaccurate capability assessment, overlooked gaps Constraints: Data availability, stakeholder input Scope: Assessment of key capabilities for architecture success Value Addition: Provides insights into gaps and areas needing enhancement for business transformation. Assumptions: Capability data is accurate and reflects current organizational state. |
5: Assess Readiness for Business Transformation
Supplier: Senior leadership, transformation teams
Input: Organizational culture, change management practices, capability gaps
Process:
Assess the organization’s readiness for transformation.
Identify potential obstacles to change.
Activities:
Conduct readiness assessments.
Document cultural and operational readiness.
Control: Change management frameworks, readiness assessment tools
Feedback: Leadership feedback on transformation readiness
Resources: Change management experts, transformation leads
Stakeholders: Senior management, business units, HR, transformation office
Metrics: Readiness scores, identified transformation barriers
Risks: Resistance to change, low readiness for transformation
Constraints: Cultural resistance, lack of resources for transformation
Scope: Limited to readiness assessment for business transformation
Value Addition: Ensures realistic expectations and prepares for challenges in transformation.
Assumptions: Organization is willing to transform and adopt change initiatives.
6: Define Scope
Supplier: Project sponsors, stakeholders
Input: Business goals, capability gaps, architecture vision
Process:
Define the boundaries and scope of the architecture effort.
Activities:
Develop the scope statement.
Confirm scope with key stakeholders.
Control: Scope documentation, project governance
Feedback: Stakeholder review and feedback on defined scope
Resources: Project team, architects, stakeholders
Stakeholders: Business leadership, project team, governance board
Metrics: Clarity and approval of scope, alignment with goals
Risks: Scope creep, misalignment with objectives
Constraints: Limited resources, time constraints
Scope: Defines what is included/excluded in the architecture project
Value Addition: Prevents scope creep and ensures alignment with business goals.
Assumptions: Stakeholders have a clear understanding of the project scope.
7. Confirm and Elaborate Architecture Principles, Including Business Principles
8. Develop Architecture Vision
9. Define the Target Architecture Value Propositions and KPIs
10. Identify Business Transformation Risks and Mitigation Activities
It is important to identify the risks associated with the Architecture Vision, evaluating their severity and frequency. Risks should be assessed at two stages: the initial level of risk, before any mitigation efforts, and the residual level of risk after mitigation actions are taken. Each risk must be paired with an appropriate mitigation strategy. A risk management framework is available in the TOGAF Standard to guide this process. Risk mitigation activities should also be included in the Statement of Architecture Work to ensure proper tracking and management. Risk Identification: Recognize risks related to the Architecture Vision, evaluating their severity (e.g., catastrophic, critical, marginal, negligible) and the likelihood of occurrence. Risk Assessment: Assess the risks at two stages: Initial Level of Risk: Evaluate the risk before applying any mitigation strategies. Residual Level of Risk: Assess the risk after applying mitigation measures. Risk Mitigation: Develop a mitigation strategy for each identified risk. Risk Management Framework: The TOGAF Standard — ADM Techniques offers a framework for managing risk. Inclusion in Architecture Work: Risk mitigation activities should be documented within the Statement of Architecture Work.
11. Develop Statement of Architecture Work and Secure Approval
References and Suggested Readings
1: https://www.goskills.com/Resources/Technology-business-learning