Research For Distance Education (415)

Block 1 : Introduction to Research in Distance Education

Unit 1: Introduction to Educational Research: Purpose , Nature and Scope

Sources of Knowledge 1.3 Purpose of Research 1.3.1 Training and Research 1.3.2 Problem Solving 1.3.3 Search for Truth: Scientific Inquiry and Theory Development

1.4 Nature of Research 1.4.1 Characteristics of Research 1.4.2 Types of Research 1.4.3 Meaning of Educational Research 1.4.4 Scientific Approach in Educational Research

1.5 Scope of Educational Research 1.5.1 Methodological Classification 1.5.2 Area-wise Classification

In deductive reasoning, the investigator proceeds from general to specific statements. In inductive reasoning, the argument and strength is derived from the observed phenomena. Both deductive and inductive reasoning have made significant contribution towards developing a systematic approach to establish truth. Deductive reasoning is a thinking process in which one proceeds from general to specific statements, through logical arguments. Inductive reasoning derives its argument and strength from the observed phenomena. Scientific approach is generally described as a process in which investigators move inductively from their observations to hypotheses and then deductively from the hypotheses to the logical implications of the hypotheses. This approach, or ‘research’ as source of information, has been increasingly used to prepare strategies and arrive at definite conclusions. As research systematically describes or measures reality in an objective way, it is a better source of knowledge, than one’s own experience, customs and traditions, deductive or inductive reasoning. The second purpose of research is diagnosing and solving the problems in the system. In this case, the system is distance education. Search for truth is the biggest challenge in research. Research in search of truth is often classified as pure research in the otherwise controversial pure- applied research continuum. The search for truth, from the angle of research, is the ability to  generalize and thus, create knowledge. Such generalizations are derived from occurrences in repeated instances

Scientific enquiry starts with facts and then moves towards theorizing. To be useful, facts must be organized, and the primary purpose of the  scientific method is to develop a mechanism of organizing the facts, as they accumulate, and become meaningful from the stand point of their objectives. Through empirical investigations, scientists gather many facts. As these facts accumulate, there is a need for integration, organization, and classification in order to make the isolated findings meaningful.

Significant relationship in the data must be identified and explained. In other words, theories must be formulated. Theory may be defined as “a set of interrelated constructs (concepts), definitions and propositions that present a systematic view of a phenomena by specifying relations among variables, with the purpose of predicting and explaining the phenomena” (Kerlinger, 1973).

A hypothesis, when accepted, explains a small number of facts and the relationship between them. Generalization, as the term denotes, is a hypothesis based on broader phenomena. Theory, explains even more facts and their inter-relations. Theories themselves range from the simple to the more sophisticated. Finally there are laws, which have the greatest scope and generality.

There are several purposes to be served by a theory in the development of science. We shall briefly consider three of them here. First, theory summarizes and puts in order the existing knowledge in a particular area. It permits deeper understanding of data and translates empirical findings into a more easily retainable and adaptable form. The theory of oxidation for instance, places into focus many of the chemical reactions common to everyday life. Secondly, theory provides a provisional explanation for observed events and relationships. It identifies the variables that are related and the nature of their relationship. A theory of learning, for example, could explain the relationship between the speed and efficiency of learning and such other variables as motivation, reward and practice. Lastly, theory permits the prediction of the occurrence of phenomena and enables the investigator to postulate and, eventually, to discover hitherto unknown phenomena.

A theory is built upon collected facts. The investigator then searches, makes intelligent guesses as to how the facts are ordered, adds missing ideas or links, and puts forward a hypothesis; deduces what consequence should follow from the hypothesis and looks for further facts which are consistent or otherwise with the deductions; builds a wider generalization or conceptual framework on more facts; and eventually outlines a theory. Theories are solidly based on evidence. And they are important practical tools which enable us to advance our knowledge still further. Once a theoretical framework has been elaborated we know what facts to look for to confirm or to deny the theory; also, we have a conceptual framework inside with which our evidence can be tested.

We may think of six levels of theorizing, which we briefly discuss below.

Level 1. Hypothesis formation: This is the level of hypothesis formation. Any hypothesis which is to be used as a basis for research goes beyond the facts on which it is based. The purpose is to establish the existing state of affairs. Nearly all surveys are conducted for this purpose. Thus, students of education may conduct a survey of what the pupils think of a particular aspect of the curriculum; how much time is spent by pupils in watching television, etc. Direct study of aspects is probably the simplest to undertake though this does not mean that it is easy to plan and execute

Level 2. Elementism: Examples of theories at this level are primitive forms of classification in terms of some significant set of ideas or idea. In the case of education and distance education, classification of abilities derived from factor analysis, or the classification of teaching acts that may be the result of extensive classroom observation, would come under the level of elementism.

Level 3. Descriptive theories and taxonomies: Formulation of descriptive theories and taxonomies occurs at a more complex level than mere classification. An example of theorizing at this level is the taxonomy of human learning provided by Gagne. Gagne classified learning into eight different categories, which vary from the most simple to the most complex. Bloom’s taxonomy of cognitive behaviours can also be placed under this level.

Level 4. Classification: For development of any kind of useful classificatory system, there is a need for a set of theoretical ideas to underlie the classification. The classification of animals acquired significance only after it was realized that, the species could be fitted into a system in which the evolutionary relationships between animals became the basis for classification. Although the concept of evolution became a basis for systematic classification of living creatures the theory of evolution itself represents theory construction at a higher level. In this type of theorizing, abstract ideas are introduced to explain relationships between observed phenomena. The classical conditioning theory of Pavlov falls into this class of theorizing. The dog learns to salivate at the sound of the bell because the sound of the bell and the presence of food are conditions that become linked in some unseen way in the brain of the animal. Theories at this level may still be quite primitive; for example, it is quite difficult to carry out theorizing at higher levels in behavioural and social sciences.

Levels 5 and 6. Postulates and theories: the higher levels: These are levels of theorizing observed in physical sciences. At the highest level, a theory consists of a set of basic statements called the axioms of theory, which tell us what the theory is all about. Such axiomatic statements or postulates as they are called, include primitive terms. These are terms that are intuitively understood and cannot be otherwise completely defined. One distinction that can be made between Level 5 and Level 6 is that the former is reserved for incomplete theories. And the latter, i.e., Level 6 theories represent the ultimate in scientific formulations. They represent the closest approximations to what one might call the accurate description of universal laws.

 

Differentiate between fundamental and applied research. 

We can think of two major types of research—fundamental or basic research, and applied research. This classification is based on the goal or objective of the research. 

Fundamental Research: This type of research aims at obtaining the empirical data that can be used to formulate, expand or evaluate a theory. This type of study is not oriented in design or purpose towards the solution of practical problems. Its essential aim is to expand the frontiers of knowledge without any intention of practical application. Of course, the findings may be eventually applied to practical problems that have social value. For example, advances in the practice of medicine are dependent upon basic research in biochemistry and microbiology. Likewise, progress in educational practise has been related to progress in the discovery of general laws of learning through basic research in psychology, education and sociology. The primary concern of basic research, however, is the creation of knowledge solely for the sake of knowledge. Its design is not hampered by considerations of special usefulness of the findings

Applied Research: Applied research is directed towards the solution of an immediate, specific and practical problem. This is a research performed in relation to actual problems and under conditions in which they are found in practice. Through applied research, educators are often able to solve their problems at the appropriate level of complexity. For instance, in the classroom teaching-learning situation, we may depend on basic research for discovering the more general laws of learning, but applied research must be conducted in order to determine how these laws operate in the classroom. This approach is essential if scientific changes in teaching practices are to be effected. It needs to be noted that there is not always a sharp line of demarcation between basic and applied research. Certainly, applications of theory help in solving practical problems. We apply theories of learning in the classroom. On the other hand, basic research may depend upon the findings of applied research to complete its theoretical formulations. An experiment in classroom learning could shed some light on a learning theory. Furthermore, observations in a practical situation serve to test theories and may lead to the formulation of new theories.

 Discuss any three elements of critical social research. 

Explain the need for conducting research in distance education.

The purpose of research can be captured in a hierarchical/taxonomic fashion. The lowest level or the first level in the purpose of research is training. The second level is research for problem solving, and The third and the highest form is research in search of truth or knowledge generation. Executing a research project in a scientific manner needs training in research methods. This course on research methodology provides the theoretical background for your research project.

 The major characteristics of any research, are: objectivity, precision, design and verifiability. Let us look at these attributes more closely: 

Objectivity: Ideally, research is beyond the subjective bias of the researcher. The researcher makes deliberate efforts to eliminate personal  reference resisting the temptation to seek only such data that supports his/her hypothesis. The scientific research has no onus to persuade or prove. The emphasis is on testing, rather than proving  the hypothesis. The researcher is willing to suspend personal judgement and permit the data and logic to lead independently to a sound conclusion. Objectivity is achieved through standardization of research instruments, choosing appropriate research design and tools and ensuring dependability of data.

Precision: Research uses a technical language, so as to convey the exact meaning to the reader, e.g., validity, reliability, random sampling, etc. The most precise expression in quantitative research is a mathematical equation or statistical finding which explains or represents the truth. Precision in qualitative research is achieved through words rather than numbers. Precise language describes the study accurately so that the study may be replicated or the results correctly used. Design: As mentioned earlier, the researcher has to have a systematic design. This will imply that any scientific inquiry will, in general, undergo the following steps: – definition of the problem, – statement of the hypothesis, – collection and analysis of data, – testing and confirmation or rejection of hypothesis, and – reporting of results. Only if the research has an orderly design, it can be replicated for verification. 

Verifiability: This is an important characteristic of every research. Research design and findings are presented to the professional community for other researchers to analyze, confirm or reject them. Research is a social enterprises and its information is open for public scrutiny. This  characteristics of research, i.e., verifiability, is related to the criteria of objectivity and precision. Only through further investigation or replication of studies can the results of a single study be confirmed or revised. Through this process, a body of new knowledge is developed and new questions identified.  Verifiability is achieved primarily through two different approaches: first, analyzing the same data on the same sample through alternative analytical tools (statistical methods), second, replicating the study on a different sample.

Elaborate any one dimension of research in distance education.

 

Discuss the research findings in the area of “Instructional Processes” in India and abroad. Do you find any gap ? If yes, formulate a research problem to explore the gaps.

What is empirical research ? Describe the main features of empirical research in the context of open and distance learning. What are the main features of empirical research ? Discuss the steps involved in carrying out empirical research in open and distance education.

Discuss the scope of Experimental Research in Distance Education. Explain the designs of experimental study with help of examples. 

The major areas of educational research are related to development, curriculum, teaching, sociological academic issues affecting education, educational administration, development of educational technology and problems of individual differences among learners

Education is an interdisciplinary field of inquiry that has borrowed concepts and theories from physics, biology, psychology, sociology, anthropology, political science, economics and other disciplines. The methodologies used in educational research are also derived from several disciplines, e.g. systems analysis from biology, experimental designs from physical and natural sciences, observation and interviewing from anthropological  sciences, testing from the discipline of psychology, and the like.

This categorization, that of basic and applied research, is true for educational research as well. In addition, educational research can be categorized differently under four types: Historical research, Descriptive research, Experimental research and Action research. Brief notes on all these types and the methods involved therein are given below to continue the discussion.

Historical research: This type of research describes what was. The process involves investigation, recording, analysing and interpreting the events of the past in order to make generalizations; these generalization are helpful in understanding the past, building a perspective about the present, and to a limited extent, in anticipating the future. The main purpose of historical research, therefore, is to arrive at an exact account of the past so as to gain a clearer perspective for the present. And this knowledge further enables us, at least partially, to predict and control our future existence/activities.

Descriptive research: This type of research describes what is. It involves the description, recording, analysis and interpretation of conditions that exist. It involves some type of comparison or contrast and attempts to discover relationships existing between variables. Much educational research is aimed at describing the characteristics of students and the educational environment. The nature of prevailing conditions, educational practices and existing attitudes must be determined before we can move on to solving problems about learners, institutional organization or the teaching of a subject. Research of this nature may not answer basic questions, but it does permit the gathering of information which serves as a basis for future research. 

Experimental research: This type of research describes what will be when certain variables are carefully controlled or manipulated. The focus is on the relationship between two sets of variables. One set of variables is deliberately manipulated (experimental treatment of the independent variable) to examine it’s or impact on another set of variables (dependent variables). For example, in one of the experimental studies, a distance education tutor held specially designed contact classes (independent variable or treatment) for a particular group of distance learners and studied its impact on their performance in the university examination (dependent variable). The experimental research involved systematic recording of data and scientific analysis later. This type of research leads to developing testable hypotheses, generalizations and predictions. This methodology is derived largely from the physical sciences.

Action research: Action research involves the application of the steps of the scientific method to educational problems. Although it is similar in some respects to experimental research, action research differs principally in the extent to which findings can be generalized. Primary concern for action research is problem solving, hence, it is focused on the immediate application and not on the development of a theory. Many action research projects are carried out in a single classroom by a single teacher; and the others, by all the teachers in an institution or even any aspect. Its findings are to be evaluated in terms of local applicability, not in terms of universal validity. Its purpose is to improve institutional practices.

 

Select a research problem from the field of open and distance learning and state the purpose for selecting this specific research problem within 200 words. Prepare a research proposal consisting of all the components within 1200 words. 

 

Compare various research studies carried out on ‘distance learners’ at the national and international levels.

 

Unit 2: Research Paradigms in Distance Education

2.2 Research Paradigms in Distance Education 2.2.1 Empiricist Paradigm 2.2.2 Interpretive Paradigm – Phenomenology 2.2.3 Critical Paradigm 2.2.4 Phenomenography and the Second Order Perspective

2.3 Approaches to Distance Education Research 2.3.1 Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches 2.3.2 Triangulation Approach 2.3.3 Component Analysis Approach 2.3.4 Model Building 

2.4 Research Areas

Explain the meaning of paradigm with help of examples. Discuss any three paradigms of research in Distance Education.

Many researchers have talked about the way scientists use models known as maps or paradigms to develop a framework for distance educational research. The paradigm approach provides for a solid background in each research exercise and helps us to follow up, in depth, specific areas. This background is an essential part of the development of models in distance education research. A review of relevant literature indicates four major paradigms: (i) empirical – analytic (roughly equivalent to quantitative science) (ii) interpretive – symbolic (qualitative or hermeneutical inquiry) (iii) critical – (where criteria relating to human betterment are applied in research) (iv) phenomenography

Unit 3: Research in Distance Education

3.2 Reviewing the Review 3.2.1 Trends, Status and Future Development 3.2.2 Methodological Issues

3.3 Research Areas 3.3.1 Growth of Distance Education: Policies, Patterns and Organization 3.3.2 Programmes and Courses 3.3.3 Distance Learners 3.3.4 Instructional Processes 3.3.5 Programme Development and Evaluation 3.3.6 Output and Impact of Distance Education 3.3.7 Economics of Distance Education

3.4. Research Ethics 

3.5 Future of Research in Distance Education

 

 

Compare the research findings of studies in the area of growth of distance education in India and international research. 

What are the findings of the research studies conducted on ‘instructional processes’ of distance education in India ?

Compare the findings of the research studies conducted on ‘Distance learners’ in India with the international  perspective. Describe the four stages of action research.

Discuss with examples the ethical issues in research related to Distance Education.

Describe any two levels of theorizing in research for Distance Education.

Discuss the various approaches to Research in Distance Education with the help of examples.

What is the role of Descriptive Research in Distance Education ? Discuss with the help of examples.

Discuss characteristics of any research activity. 

Differentiate between applied research and action research on methodological components. Discuss, how you would apply the various stages of action research while considering any area of activity of ODL institutions. 

Discuss the research studies pertaining to distance learners—needs and aspirations, dropout and learning styles  carried out in ODL at national and international levels.

Discuss the limitations involved in applying scientific approach in ODL research. 

 

 Describe the various methods of collecting data for carrying out research in open and distance learning. How would you ensure the quality of data ? Give examples.

 

Unit 4: Formulation of Research Problem

4.2 Sources of Identifying a Problem 4.2.1 Professional Experience 4.2.2 Professional Literature 4.2.3 Inference from Theories and Other Sources 4.3 Definition of the Problem 4.3.1 Statement of the Problem 4.3.2 Operationalisation of Variables 4.3.3 Evaluation of the Problem

4.4 Hypothesis 4.4.1 Importance of Hypothesis 4.4.2 Characteristics of a Good Hypothesis 4.4.3 Formulation of Hypothesis 4.4.4 Three Forms of Hypothesis 

4.5 Hypothesising in Various Types of Research 4.5.1 Hypothesis in Historical Research 4.5.2 Hypothesis in Experimental Research 4.5.3 Hypothesis in Descriptive Research

 

A good hypothesis has several basic characteristics. We discuss some of them as follows: 

i) Providing direction: Hypotheses provide direction to research and prevent review of irrelevant literature and collection of useless or excessive data. They enable you to classify the information from the stand point of both ‘relevance’ and ‘organisation’. This is necessary because, a given fact may be relevant with respect to one  hypothesis and irrelevant with respect to another, or it may belong to one classification with regard to first hypothesis or to an entirely different classification with regard to the second. Thus, hypotheses ensure the collection of relevant data necessary to answer questions arising from the statement of the problem. For example, in a research problem, ‘Study habits and achievement of Distance  education Learners’, the researcher may frame the hypothesis – learners putting in more study hours achieve more in the examination. The researcher will collect data about the number of hours being put in by learners for study and their achievement in the examination.

ii) Hypothesis should be testable: Hypotheses should be stated in such a way as to indicate an expected difference or an expected relationship  between the measures used in the research. The researcher should not state any hypothesis that she/he does not have reason to believe that it can be tested or evaluated by some objective means. Hypotheses are the propositions about the relationships between variables. These can be tested empirically. There is no relationship between attendance to personal contact programmes in a distance education course and achievement in examination. Such propositions can be tested by means of empirical data.

iii) Hpothesis should be brief and clear: Hypothesis should be stated clearly and briefly. It makes problems easier for the reader to understand and also for the researcher to test. The statement should be a concise statement of the relationship expected. 

Hypotheses are formulated to explain observed facts, conditions, or behaviour and to serve as a guide in the research process. The statements or  tentative generalisations which constitute hypotheses are partly based on facts and explanations, and partly conceptual. Hence, there are certain necessary conditions that are conducive to the formulation of hypothesis. These are: i) Deducing a hypothesis inductively: You may deduce a hypothesis inductively after making observations of behavior, noticing trends or probable relationships. For example, as a teacher you observe your learners behaviour in the classroom. On the basis of your experience in the educational institution, you may attempt to relate your behaviour with that of the learners, to various teaching-learning methods as well as to the change in the institution itself and so on. On the basis of these  observations, you may be able to formulate a hypothesis that attempts to explain these behavioural relationships in an educational setting. 

ii) Limiting the problem: Here you need to state that the basic understanding of the literature pertaining to the problem under investigation also becomes essential in view of the fact that the already existing corpus of knowledge on the particular problem is too detailed to be incorporated in the process of hypothesis formulation. Hence, the researcher must have the ability to comprehend the available evidence in support or against the expected relationships so as to remain within the limits of the problem while formulating the hypothesis. 

iii) Deriving a hypothesis deductively: Hypotheses are also derived deductively from the theory. Such types of hypothesis, called “deductive hypotheses” are formulated by studying a particular theory in the area of one’s interest and deducting a hypothesis from this theory through logic. This is possible when a researcher has a versatile intellect and can make use of it for restructuring his/her experiences in research. Creative approach to problem solving so badly needed by a researcher, is the product of intellectual adventure, sound attitude and agile intellect. This view is more relevant to descriptive and historical research in which the abundance of literature with a number of contradictory/supplementary theories may divert the researcher from the right path. Therefore, you have to exercise great restraint and display considerable patience to keep yourself on the right path. You have to develop certain habits and attitudes, besides saturating yourself with all the possible information about the problem and also think open-mindedly about it before proceeding further in the conduct of the study. 

iv) Hypothesis from analogies, conversations, etc.: Analogies also lead a researcher to clues that may prove to be useful in the formulation of hypotheses and for finding solutions to problems. For example, a new social situation resembles an old one with respect to a particular set of factors. If the researcher knows that the factors correlate in a particular fashion in the old situation, he/she may hypothesize in terms of trends in the relationship to be expected in the new social situation. However, it is   to be mentioned here that use of analogies must be made cautiously as they are not fool-proof tools for finding solutions to problems.

Describe briefly various forms of hypothesis. Explain with examples how hypothesis is formulated in different types of research.

To arrive at some conclusions pertaining to a particular research problem, a hypothesis is generally stated in testable form for its proper testing. It  may be stated either in declarative form, the null form or the question form. What do these three forms mean?

Declarative hypothesis: When a researcher makes a positive statement about the outcome of the study, we get a declarative hypothesis. For example, the hypothesis ‘The performance of the creatives on problem solving tasks is significantly higher than the non-creatives’ is stated in the declarative form. Here, the researcher makes an attempt to predict the future outcome. This prediction is based on the theoretical formulation of  that should happen in a particular situation if the explanations of the behaviour (performance on problem solving tasks) which the researcher has given in his/her theory are correct.

Null hypothesis: A null hypothesis is a non-directional hypothesis that proposes no difference or no relationship. The usual form of such hypothesis is: “There is no significant difference between the performance of two groups of students, one following the conventional system of education and the second following distance-mode of education. Since a null hypothesis can be statistically tested, it is also known as “statistical hypothesis” or “testing hypothesis”. The proponents of null hypothesis emphasize that the researcher must remain unbiased throughout his/her research efforts. This view is defended on the basis of the fact that in this case the researcher neither predicts a result nor indicates a preconceived attitude that may influence his/her behaviour during the conduct of the study. On the other hand, those who criticize the use of null hypothesis argue that the researcher should indicate the direction of the outcomes of the study, wherever possible. It is further argued that predicting the results of a study is less awkward in phrasing a relationship, than in using the ‘no difference’ phrase that is usual in the null form. A null hypothesis challenges the assertion of a declarative hypothesis and also denies it altogether. It says even where it seems to hold good, it is so due to mere coincidence. It is for the researcher to reject the null hypothesis by showing that the outcome mentioned in the declarative hypothesis does occur and the quantum there of is so significant that it cannot easily be said to have occurred by chance. The reasons for rejecting the null hypothesis may differ.  Sometimes the null hypothesis is rejected only when the probability of its having occurred by a mere chance is 1 out of 100 or .01 out of 1. In such instances, we consider the probability of its having occurred by chance to be too little to be considered, and we reject the chance component of the null hypothesis and take the occurrence to be due to a genuine tendency.

Hypothesis in question form: In the question-form-hypothesis, instead of stating what outcome is expected, a question is asked as to what the outcome will be. e.g. if you are interested to find out whether instructions through video programmes have any positive effect on the learning of the students of Master of Arts (Distance Education). The declarative form of the hypothesis will be: ‘Will Instruction through video programmes affect the learning of student of Distance Education?’ This statement shows that instructions through video programmes is not related to learning. It is easier to state a hypothesis in question form because it appears to be quite useful to write down all the questions that one wants to answer in a particular research study. On the other hand, a researcher faces difficulties in predicting the outcome of the study and stating the hypothesis in declarative form. But it is worth noting that the question form is less powerful than the declarative or null form as a tool for obtaining valid information, and it is generally advisable to state a hypothesis in directional i.e., declarative form to arrive at valid conclusions and generalizations. However, this last statement should not be taken as if it were a law in the practice and theory of research.

 

Describe the various sources of identifying a research problem. Select a problem and write objectives of the research problem.

Identify a research problem and explain how you will solve it by using a case study method.

Identify a research problem of naturalistic inquiry. Explain the steps you will follow to solve the identified problem. 

‘Problem identification is the first step towards good research.’ Justify your answer with reference to the issues related to formulation of a research problem.

Discuss the elements and approaches of critical social research with the help of suitable examples.

Block 2: Research Methods For Distance Education

 

Unit 1: Methods of Educational Research 

1.2 Empiricism 1.2.1 Empirical Enquiry 1.2.2 Empirical Research Process

1.3 Phenomenology 1.3.1 Positivism Vs Phenomenology 1.3.2 Phenomenological Approaches in Social and Educational Research 1.3.3 Phenomenology and Educational Research

1.4 Critical Paradigm 1.4.1 Paradigms 1.4.2 Elements of Critical Social Research 1.4.3 Critical Research Process 1.4.4 Approaches in Critical Social Research

Educational researchers study the socio-cultural implications involved in education. In this regard, different scientific disciplines have influenced educational research in terms of theorisation as well as methods adopted in the pursuit of knowledge. Doing educational research is not just about selecting and constructing a data collection technique. On the contrary, it embraces conceptualization of the problem, theoretical debate,  specification of research practices, analytic frameworks, and epistemological presuppositions.

Educational research depends on empirical methods to collect information regarding matters concerning education. In trying to seek explanations for what is observed, most scientists usually make use of positivistic assumptions and perspectives. However, the phenomenologist challenges these assumptions and concentrates primarily on experiential reality and its descriptions rather than on causal explanations.

1.2 Empiricism 1.2.1 Empirical Enquiry 1.2.2 Empirical Research Process

An empiricist is one who practices empiricism i.e., the system which, rejecting all a priori knowledge rests solely on experience and induction. To Bacon goes the honor of being the first “Martyr of Empiricism”. Bacon (1561-1626), one of the modern scientific thinkers, is known for his emphasis on induction, the use of direct observation to confirm ideas and the linking together of observed facts to form theories or explanations of how natural phenomena work.

Science consists of theory and facts. A fact is an empirically verifiable observation and a theory tries to find relationships between facts. The facts of science are the product of observations. Theory construction is the most important objective of empirical scientific inquiries. Theory usually gives orientation to empirical inquiries. Theory guides the collection of relevant data and offers a conceptual scheme to bind them together in a more systematic manner. Theories represent an improvement in our knowledge. They also help us to predict facts. In a way, facts help to initiate theories and to test the validity of existing theories. They clarify and redefine theory. Theories and facts stimulate each other and contribute to the growth of empirical knowledge.

Empirical studies include the whole gamut of research tools: observation, both participant and non-participant; formal interviews with random samples; semistructured, unstructured and in-depth interviewing; key informant testimonies; analysis of personal and institutional documents; mass media analysis; archive searching; examination of official statistics; and reviews of published literature. Furthermore, empirical social research also uses a wide variety of analytical techniques; ethnographic interpretation, historical reconstruction, action research, multivariate analysis, structuralist deconstruction and semiological analysis.

Empirical research involves the pursuit of truth as determined by facts and logical considerations. It is aimed at a systematic interrelation of facts by experimentation, observation, and logical procedures. It encourages a rigorous impersonal procedure dictated by the demand of logic and objective procedure. It is a method wherein the investigation proceeds in a systematic and orderly manner. Empirical research usually consists of the following steps: (1) collecting data by means of careful and critical observation with patience, precision and impartiality, (2) measurement, (3) classification and tabulation of data, (4) analysis and reduction, (5) formulation of hypothesis, and (6) formulation of a theory or a law.

The following are the main features of empirical scientific research:  1. Observation 2. Use of concepts 3. Objectivity 4. Verifiability 5. Predictability 6. Systematic nature.

1.3 Phenomenology 1.3.1 Positivism Vs Phenomenology 1.3.2 Phenomenological Approaches in Social and Educational Research 1.3.3 Phenomenology and Educational Research

Phenomenology is a philosophy of knowledge that emphasizes direct observation of  phenomena. Unlike positivists, however, phenomenologists seek to sense reality and to describe it in words rather than numbers: words that reflect consciousness and perception. The philosophical foundations of phenomenology were developed by Edmund Husserl (1859-1938), who argued that the scientific method, appropriate for the study of physical phenomena, was inappropriate for the study of human thought and action. 

Phenomenologists concentrate on phenomena per se, and try to produce convincing descriptions of what they experience rather than explanations and causes. 

Good ethnography is usually good phenomenology, and there is no substitute for a good story, well told.

The split between the scientific approach and the humanistic-phenomenological approach pervades the human sciences. 

In psychology, most research is in the quantitative, scientific tradition, while phenomenology flourishes in clinical work because, its practitioners cogently point out, it works. 

In sociology, there is a significant, but small, tradition of qualitative, phenomenological research, but the field is mostly dominated by the quantitative, positivistic approach. 

The reverse is true in cultural anthropology, in which there is a significant, quantitative, positivistic research, but most of the field is qualitatively and phenomenologically oriented.

The term phenomenology needs some clarification because it is talked about a good deal these days and is frequently used in the most general way to mean any sort of experientially based methodology. Even within the Western philosophical tradition the word labels a very broad movement and not a precise school or unitary method. Speaking generally, a phenomenological study is one that is grounded in the direct experience of aspects of one’s own consciousness

The positivist versus the phenomenological approach to the study of man and society is considered in terms of one of the major debates in social science research. Many of the founding fathers of sociology believed that it would be possible to create a science of society based on the same principles and procedures as natural sciences such as chemistry and biology. This approach is known as positivism. 

They believed that this would reveal that the evolution of society followed ‘invariable laws’. And that it would  show that the behaviour of man was governed by principles of cause and effect which were just as invariable as the behaviour of matter, the subject of the natural sciences.

The behaviour of man, like the behaviour of matter, can be objectively measured. Just as the behaviour of matter can be quantified by measures such as weight, temperature and pressure, methods of objective measurement can be devised for human behaviour. Such measurement is essential to explain behaviour. For example, in order to explain the reaction of a particular chemical to heat, it is necessary to provide exact measurement of temperature, weight and so on. With such measurements it will be possible to accurately observe the behaviour of matter and produce a statement of cause and effect. From a positivist viewpoint such methods and assumptions are applicable to human behaviour.

Observations of behaviour based on objective measurement, from this viewpoint, will make it possible to produce statements of cause and effect. Theories may then be devised to explain observed behaviour. It argues that factors which are not directly observable, such as meanings, feelings and purposes, are not particularly important and can be misleading. For example, if the majority of adult members of society enter into marriage and produce children, these facts can be observed and quantified. They, therefore, form reliable data. However, the range of meanings that members of society give to these activities, their purposes for marriage and procreation are not directly observable. Even if they could be accurately measured, they may well divert attention from the real cause of behaviour. The meanings and purposes they attach to this behaviour are largely inconsequential.

Phenomenological perspectives in social research reject many of the assumptions of positivism. They argue that the subject matter of social and natural sciences is fundamentally different. As a result, methods and assumptions of the natural sciences are inappropriate to the study of man. The natural sciences deal with matter. They do not have meanings and purposes which direct their behaviour. As a result the natural scientist is able to observe, measure, and impose an external logic on that behaviour in order to explain it. He/she has no need to explore the internal logic of the consciousness of matter simply because it does not exist.

Unlike matter, a human being has consciousness — thoughts, feelings, meanings, intentions and an awareness of being. Because of this, his/her actions are meaningful, he/she defines situations and gives meaning to his/her actions and those of others. As a result, he/she does not merely react to external stimuli, nor does he/she simply behave, he/she acts. Imagining the response of early man to fire caused by volcanoes or spontaneous combustion, we can see that she/he did not react in a uniform manner to the experience of heat. He/she attached a range of meanings to it and these meanings directed his/her actions. For example, he/she defined fire as a means of warmth and used it to heat his/her dwellings; as a means of defence and used it to ward off wild animals; and as a means of transforming substances and employed it for cooking and hardening points of wooden spears. Man does not just react to fire, he/she acts upon the terms of the meanings he/she gives to it. The researcher cannot simply observe action from the outside and impose an external logic upon it. He/she must interpret the internal logic which directs the actions of the actor.

The distinction between positivist and pheonomenological approaches is not as clear cut as this section has implied. There is considerable debate over whether or not a particular theory should be labeled positivist or phenomenological. Often it is a matter of degree since many theories lie somewhere between the two extremes.

1.3.2 Phenomenological Approaches in Social and Educational Research

Hermeneutical Phenomenology

Transpersonal Phenomenology

Social Phenomenology





Describe the empirical research process, 

Explain the meaning of phenomenology and differentiate it from positivism, 

Explain the phenomenological approaches in social science research,

List the functions of critical paradigm, 

Describe the elements and approaches of critical social research.

Describe the stages involved in the experimental research.

Discuss the process of organization of qualitative data in research. Describe any two methods of analysis of qualitative data.

Explain the limitations of applying scientific approach in educational research. Support your answer with suitable illustrations.

Unit 2: Philosophical and Historical Methods

Explain the two processes ‘external criticism and ‘internal criticism of historical research. Describe the steps involved in conducting historical research.

Explain the dimensions of research in distance education. Identify and discuss the research gaps in each of these dimensions.

Discuss the applications of ‘mode’ in descriptive statistics with examples.

Describe the key points a researcher must observe and record, while conducting an `interview’ for data collection.

Describe the present trends and possible future developments of research in open and distance learning:

Discuss the use of philosophical method in research for distance education.

 

Unit 3: Naturalistic Inquiry and Case Study

You have to study “distance education system in your institution” . describe the main steps of the case study method.

Enumerate the characteristics of case study method in research for distance education.

Differentiate between external and internal criticism in historical research. 

Explain why naturalistic studies face the issue of subjectivity.

Write a short note on Scientific nature of Case study method. 

Discuss the characteristics of normal probability curve. 

Discuss the characteristics of a good hypothesis. 

Differentiate between parametric and nonparametric tests. 

Discuss the purposes and characteristics of case study method of research in open and distance learning (ODL). Describe how would you take up this method considering a case from learner support services or course evaluation in ODL.

Discuss various purposes of conducting research in open and distance learning. 

Enumerate, how the triangulation approach facilitates cross-checking of research findings in open and distance learning with examples.

 

Unit 4: Descriptive, Experimental and Action Research

Differentiate between pre-experimental, true experimental and quasi experimental design of experimental study

List the main steps of conducting descriptive research

Compare the methodological components pertaining to applied and action research. Discuss the different stages for conducting action research in Distance Education.

Explain the measures of ‘central tendency’.

What is a sociogram ? How will you use sociometric technique in research ?

 

Block 3: Tools For Research

 

Unit 1: Methods of Sampling

Differentiate between probability sampling and non-probability sampling

Differentiate between incidental sample and Quota sample

Describe the characteristics of a probability sample. Discuss with examples, any two methods of probability sampling.

Describe the characteristics of a good sample.

Differentiate between probability and non-probability sampling. Explain any three types of probability sampling, with the help of suitable examples.

 

Unit 2: Research Tools – 1

Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of rating scale as a research tool

Differentiate between nominal scale and ordinal scale

Differentiate between interval scale and ratio scale.

Discuss the three characteristics of a good research tool. Describe the different methods to assess the reliability of a tool.

Write a short note on various approaches to Distance Education research. 

Discuss the various characteristics of a good research tool.

Describe the types of Scales used in Educational research.

Describe the use of computer for data processing in research in Distance Education.

Explain the characteristics of normal probability curve and its importance in context of research in Distance Education.

Differentiate between purposive and quota sampling techniques. 

Describe the needs for literature review in research. 

Discuss the use of ratio and interval scales in research with examples.

Explain the basic steps involved in data analysis using SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Sciences). Support your answer with examples while discussing its applications in research.

Discuss critically the levels of theorising in research for distance education.

Enumerate the advantages and limitations of questionnaire as a tool of research.

 

Unit 3 : Interview, Observation, and Documents as Tools

Compare structured questions/interview with unstructured questions/interview

Explain how you will evaluate a good questionnaire.

Explain the limitations of the observation method

Identify a research problem and describe how you will plan and execute ‘observation’ as a technique of data collection.

Compare between the closed and open-ended questionnaires as research tools.

Discuss the purposes of observation in research. Describe different procedures involved in recording observation while conducting research.

Discuss the use of interview as a tool for research.

Explain the issues of trustworthiness and objectivity in Naturalistic Inquiry as method of research in Distance Education.

Describe the uses and limitations of `interview’ as a tool of research.

 

Unit 4: Data Collection

How to ensure the quality of data?

 

Block 4: Data Analysis

 

Unit 1: Types of Data

Differentiate between quantitative and qualitative data. Describe the various methods of collecting qualitative data for conducting research in distance education.

 

Unit 2: Statistical Testing of Hypotheses

Discuss the measures of central tendency with examples and their uses in research.

Differentiate between parametric and non-parametric tests. Explain briefly the importance



Describe the characteristics of normal probability curve.

Differentiate between criteria related validity and construct validity, with the help of suitable examples.

Differentiate between cluster sampling and multistage sampling.

Compare declarative and null hypothesis with suitable examples.

Describe the three main forms of hypothesis. Discuss the conditions necessary for formulation of hypothesis. How  does the hypothesis differ in various types of researches ?

Eleven (11) learners of MADE programme had scored the following marks in their Theory paper and Project work. Is  here any relationship between the two set of marks ? Calculate and Interpret Pearson’s r and interpret the relationship. 

Theory Project work

45 56

55 50

56 48

58 60

60 62

65 64

68 65

70 70

75 74

80 82

85 90

The scores obtained on Maths test by 5 Boys and 8 Girls in class VIII are given :

Boys : 22, 30, 26, 32, 20

Girls: 27, 16, 25, 34, 20, 26, 30, 22

Find if the difference between the mean scores in Maths test of Boys and Girls significant or not ? (Support information :

Table of critical value of t

Degree of freedom (df), Level of significance (0.05), Level of significance (0.01)

10,2.23, 3.17

11 ,2.20, 3.11

12 ,2.18 ,3.06

Discuss the use of Questionnaire as a research tool in Distance Education. Use examples to strengthen your  discussion.

Explain the classification of Statistical tests used in hypothesis testing. Discuss with the  help of examples, the  application of parametric tests.

Discuss how research in open and distance learning can be categorised into different areas. Describe any four broad areas of research with one example of each.

Describe the purposes of hypothesis in research for distance education. Enumerate the three types of hypothesis with suitable examples.

Describe the characteristics of Normal Probability Curve • (NPC). Enumerate its applications with illustrations.

What is a hypothesis ? Describe the importance of hypothesis in descriptive research. Give examples. 

Explain the main features of Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) used for analysis of data collected for  research. 

What is sampling ? Describe any two types of probability sampling methods with examples.

Unit 3: Reporting Research

List the three main parts of the research report. describe any one in detail. 

Describe the specific academic issues to be considered while writing a research report.

 “Reporting of any research activity is as important as doing the research itself”. Do you agree ? Explain the main  components involved in writing a research report.

What are the major research tools used for data-gathering in Distance Education ? Discuss any two with help of examples.

What are the methods used in the analysis of qualitative data for conducting research ? Discuss various steps involved in qualitative analysis of data. 

Explain the purposes of writing a research report. Describe the various components of a research report with examples.

Unit 4: Evaluating Research Reports

You have to evaluate a research report. describe the criteria to evaluate the objectives and research instruments. Provide a sample. 

Explain how the Triangulation approach facilitates the cross checking of research findings in ODL

Purpose of writing a research report? Describe its components with example.

 

Block 5: Computer Applications in Research in Distance Education

 

Unit 1: Computer for Data Processing

rite a short note on “Content Analysis”.

Discuss the role of computers in Research in Distance Education

What is case study method ? Explain with the help of examples.

Write short note on impact of ICT on researches in distance education. 

Write short note on Interview as tool for research.

 

Unit 2: Word Processing Software

Limitations of texts’

How to use text processing in project?

 

Unit 3: Data or Statistical Analysis Software

Explain the main features of Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS). 

Differentiate between parametric and nonparametric data in research. 

What is an attitude scale ? Discuss the uses and limitations of attitude scales while conducting research.

Describe the implications of review of literatures in research in ODL.

 

Unit 4: Data Management, Analysis and Presentation

 

Leave a Comment